Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1661581
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions |
| Date | 2017-06-08 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQaOZ-7W3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tL3br-1AL-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL3br-1AL-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL3l8-1E0-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLOk1-7u5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLOtH-7xL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Any thoughts on this? My patches for the other architectures are already in linux-next. um is the only one that remains. Thanks, Logan On 27/05/17 12:15 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/05/17 12:08 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Still, those code patch could be protected by #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM, >> or better, if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM)). > > Well I think it would have to be the former seeing the latter would > still end up trying to compile the missing function. But having ifdefs > inside code is not generally seen as good idea[1]. > > I'd really like to go forward with either this patch or something like > it. The other two arches that have this problem are fine with merging a > fix and adding ifdefs to work around a single arch doesn't feel right to me. > > Thanks, > > Logan > > [1] http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/ifdefs.html >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-06-08 21:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH v2] um: add dummy ioremap and iounmap functions Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2017-06-08 21:20 +0200
csiph-web