Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1651019
| From | Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] clocksource: moxart: Add AST2500 compatible string |
| Date | 2017-05-26 03:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLc54-7AA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHFyG-2LQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL7yp-4sO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 22:28 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 03:58:40PM +0800, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > Also clean up space-before-tab issues in the documentation. > > Andrew, > > I reworked the patch to apply to the changes Linus did recently to convert to > the fttrm010 driver. > > Please have a look at: > > https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/commit/?h=clockevents/4.13&id=3ca904162ffdd72f4fad3ab731fc94a12c50f682 > I think we're going to run into trouble here: https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/tree/drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c?h=clockevents/4.13&id=3ca904162ffdd72f4fad3ab731fc94a12c50f682#n260 As it stands if a aspeed,ast2500-timer compatible is provided we'll take the else branch and hit the issues Joel found with Linus' original series counting up on the Aspeed hardware. My change was somewhat cosmetic - Ben (now Cc'ed) didn't seemed too concerned about using the the aspeed,ast2400-timer compatible string for ast2500 dts. My motivation for the patch was that by describing the aspeed,ast2500-timer compatible it signals that someone had taken a look and judged it so. However, my point is maybe one solution is simply to drop the patch and continue to use aspeed,ast2400-timer compatible where we need. Another is to rework your change to switch to of_device_compatible_match() in drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c and also check against aspeed,ast2500-timer. What direction should we go? > Shouldn't the compatible string be: > > "aspeed,ast2400-timer", "faraday,fttmr010" > "aspeed,ast2500-timer", "faraday,fttmr010" > Does it makes sense in the face of the Aspeed quirks? If so it seems reasonable, but falling back to the faraday,fttmr010 compatible could lead to failures (if the compatible driver counted up). Cheers, Andrew > > -- Daniel >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] clocksource: moxart: Add AST2500 compatible string Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-05-25 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource: moxart: Add AST2500 compatible string Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> - 2017-05-26 03:20 +0200
[PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix aspeed-2500 initialization Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-05-26 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix aspeed-2500 initialization Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-28 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix aspeed-2500 initialization Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> - 2017-05-29 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix aspeed-2500 initialization Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-05-29 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix aspeed-2500 initialization Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> - 2017-05-30 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] clocksource: moxart: Add AST2500 compatible string Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-28 16:10 +0200
csiph-web