Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1643867

Re: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for different branches

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:06:54PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> While looking into Coverity ID 1362263 I ran into the following piece of
> code at drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_virtchnl.c:445:
>
> 445        if (vchnl_msg->iw_op_code == I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER) {
> 446                if (vchnl_msg->iw_op_ver != I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER_V0)
> 447                        vchnl_pf_send_get_ver_resp(dev, vf_id, vchnl_msg);
> 448                else
> 449                        vchnl_pf_send_get_ver_resp(dev, vf_id, vchnl_msg);
> 450                return I40IW_SUCCESS;
> 451        }
>
> The issue is that lines of code 447 and 449 are identical for different
> branches.
>
> My question here is if one of the branches should be modified, or the entire
> _if_ statement replaced?
>
> Maybe a patch like the following could be applied:

It looks like that you can replace I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER_V0 with
I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER and get rid of all places with
I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER_V0.

Thanks

>
> index f4d1368..48fd327 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_virtchnl.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_virtchnl.c
> @@ -443,10 +443,7 @@ enum i40iw_status_code i40iw_vchnl_recv_pf(struct
> i40iw_sc_dev *dev,
>         if (!dev->vchnl_up)
>                 return I40IW_ERR_NOT_READY;
>         if (vchnl_msg->iw_op_code == I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER) {
> -               if (vchnl_msg->iw_op_ver != I40IW_VCHNL_OP_GET_VER_V0)
> -                       vchnl_pf_send_get_ver_resp(dev, vf_id, vchnl_msg);
> -               else
> -                       vchnl_pf_send_get_ver_resp(dev, vf_id, vchnl_msg);
> +               vchnl_pf_send_get_ver_resp(dev, vf_id, vchnl_msg);
>                 return I40IW_SUCCESS;
>         }
>         for (iw_vf_idx = 0; iw_vf_idx < I40IW_MAX_PE_ENABLED_VF_COUNT;
> iw_vf_idx++) {
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
>
> Thank you!
> --
> Gustavo A. R. Silva
>
>
>
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for different  branches "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-18 00:10 +0200
  Re: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for  different branches Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com> - 2017-05-18 08:10 +0200
  Re: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for  different branches Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> - 2017-05-18 08:40 +0200
    Re: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for  different branches Chien Tin Tung <chien.tin.tung@intel.com> - 2017-05-18 17:10 +0200
  RE: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for  different branches "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> - 2017-05-18 16:40 +0200
    Re: [infiniband-hw-i40iw] question about identical code for  different branches "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-18 20:00 +0200
      [PATCH] infiniband: hw: i40iw: fix duplicated code for different  branches "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-18 20:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] infiniband: hw: i40iw: fix duplicated code for different  branches Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> - 2017-05-19 19:00 +0200

csiph-web