Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1643813

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock

From Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock
Date 2017-05-18 07:00 +0200
Message-ID <tIlHz-4Zo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tIa9r-5sd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaCu-5S3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaCu-5S3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaVQ-5Z9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIgeR-187-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:06:07PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Is there a better way to run the timekeeping code in an userspace
> > application? I suspect it would need something like the Linux Kernel
> > Library project.
> 
> I dunno. There's probably a cleaner way to go about it, but I also
> feel like the benefit of just having the test in the kernel tree is
> that it can be managed as a unified whole, rather then the test being
> a separate thing and always playing catchup to kernel changes.

I vaguely recall a rant on the list years ago from a Linux bigwhig
saying how we don't support that kind of thing.  But maybe it is my
imagination.  In any case, IMHO running user space tests for chunks of
kernel code can be quite useful.

Thanks,
Richard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC 1/3] timekeeping: Remove support for old vsyscalls Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
  [PATCH RFC 2/3] timekeeping: Don't align frequency adjustments to ticks Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-17 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-17 19:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 19:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-18 01:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 07:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-20 02:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2017-05-22 02:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 19:10 +0200

csiph-web