Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1643813
| From | Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock |
| Date | 2017-05-18 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tIlHz-4Zo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tIa9r-5sd-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaCu-5S3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaCu-5S3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIaVQ-5Z9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIgeR-187-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:06:07PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote: > > Is there a better way to run the timekeeping code in an userspace > > application? I suspect it would need something like the Linux Kernel > > Library project. > > I dunno. There's probably a cleaner way to go about it, but I also > feel like the benefit of just having the test in the kernel tree is > that it can be managed as a unified whole, rather then the test being > a separate thing and always playing catchup to kernel changes. I vaguely recall a rant on the list years ago from a Linux bigwhig saying how we don't support that kind of thing. But maybe it is my imagination. In any case, IMHO running user space tests for chunks of kernel code can be quite useful. Thanks, Richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
[PATCH RFC 1/3] timekeeping: Remove support for old vsyscalls Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
[PATCH RFC 2/3] timekeeping: Don't align frequency adjustments to ticks Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-17 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-17 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-18 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-20 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2017-05-22 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 19:10 +0200
csiph-web