Re: [PATCH 6/9] regulator: palmas: Drop unnecessary static

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 6/9] regulator: palmas: Drop unnecessary static
Date	2017-05-15 13:00 +0200
Message-ID	<tHlTk-72L-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tDvHz-8tt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDvHz-8tt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHj59-5aS-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHlJD-6Zt-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:41:41PM +0800, Julia Lawall wrote:

> mailing lists.  If the patches are sent separately, then could there be a
> cover letter for each one?  If the semantic patch is complicated, then I
> typically put the whole thing there, and an abbreviated one in the actual
> patch.  That is not relevant here, because the semantic patch is small.

Well, if the cover letter is needed to understand the patch then it
needs to go to everyone anyway...

> Part of the purpose of the cover letter was to allow people who were not
> interested to skip over the whole thing at once.

On the flip side things that lack context can get discarded easily.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 6/9] regulator: palmas: Drop unnecessary static Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-05-15 10:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 6/9] regulator: palmas: Drop unnecessary static Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-05-15 12:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 6/9] regulator: palmas: Drop unnecessary static Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-05-15 13:00 +0200

csiph-web