Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642662
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 |
| Date | 2017-05-16 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHNwd-7SQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHL1n-6fA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHMqu-7gj-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHMJP-7nR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 16 May 2017 11:30:19 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2017 00:15:39 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > It appears that the kprobe_optimizer work thread call happened after > > > the init pages were freed, causing alternative.c to give the above > > > warning because the text that is being unoptimized happens to no longer > > > exist. > > > > Ah, I see. I need to check that case. Actually for the module > > init text area, kill_kprobe() correctly kicks kill_optimized_kprobe() > > so it should safe. But above case is on the init-text in kernel > > itself. I guess module_notifier may not be called for that area... > > Hmm, what happens if you add a kprobe to a module, remove it, and then > remove the module. In that case the kprobe will be removed before unloading the module. If the kprobe is optimized, the optimized probe itself is queued to unoptimize. > If the module is still loaded when it is removed, > wouldn't that cause the optimized probe to be delayed? Yes, it is queued, but before unloading module, it should be dequeued forcibly by kill_optimized_kprobe() from module-notifier. > Wouldn't that > open a race where the optimizer work queue can be called when no module > exists? Since both kprobe_mutex and module_mutex are held in optimizer, I couldn't think there is such race. I guess when the kernel's init-text (not module's one) is freed, it doesn't kick the module notifier and kprobes missed that. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-05-16 15:50 +0200
Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-05-16 17:20 +0200
Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-05-16 17:40 +0200
Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-05-16 18:30 +0200
Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-16 23:50 +0200
Re: WARNING at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:707 text_poke+0x25d/0x270 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-05-17 03:40 +0200
csiph-web