Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1640404
| From | Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations |
| Date | 2017-05-12 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tGh5o-3PS-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tCMhr-2Xu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tFnFT-MR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tFMkW-tO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Christian, On Wednesday 10 May 2017 13:30:37 Christian König wrote: > Am 10.05.2017 um 02:23 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > On 03/05/17 09:46 PM, Christian König wrote: > >> Am 02.05.2017 um 22:04 schrieb SF Markus Elfring: > >>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > >>> Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 22:00:02 +0200 > >>> > >>> Three update suggestions were taken into account > >>> from static source code analysis. > >>> > >>> Markus Elfring (3): > >>> Use seq_putc() in radeon_sa_bo_dump_debug_info() > >>> Use seq_puts() in radeon_debugfs_pm_info() > >>> Use seq_puts() in r100_debugfs_cp_csq_fifo() > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > > > Based on > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-May/140837.html > > and followups, I'm afraid we'll have to make sure Markus' patches have > > been tested adequately before applying them. > > I can't judge the background of that decision, but at least those tree > patches for radeon looked trivial to me. > > I don't see much what could go wrong when merging them. For what it's worth, I've once applied a patch from Markus for the uvcvideo driver that seemed trivial but ended up introducing a breakage that I hadn't caught during review. I recommend rejecting Markus' patches that are not clear improvements, and carefully testing the others. > On the other hand you are right that trying to find hardware to test that > stuff could be challenging. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-02 22:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Use seq_putc() in radeon_sa_bo_dump_debug_info() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-02 22:10 +0200
[PATCH 3/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Use seq_puts() in r100_debugfs_cp_csq_fifo() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-02 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> - 2017-05-10 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> - 2017-05-11 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-05-12 13:40 +0200
csiph-web