Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1639850
| From | Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? |
| Date | 2017-05-11 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tFYYN-ax-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tFIKm-6A2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tFKsN-7Fb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tFQoy-3dF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 05/11/2017 01:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Eric W. Biederman >> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thomas Gleixner appears to have a tree with all of those same commits >>> except with the BKrev tags stripped out. >> >> That's the best import - so use that tree by Thomas, and just use the >> git revision numbers in it (and say "tglx's linux-history tree" or >> something). > > I've been using this one by Rob Landley which seems good: > > https://landley.net/kdocs/fullhist/ > > It's grafted into the modern history so you can search seamlessly > between the two which is pretty nice. I don't see any Bitkeeper tags > though. I went through and found/tagged the major old releases, did I forget to upload a new tarball after that? v0.0.1 cff5a6fb66765e90470f4d9ca2398da0ca3c75d5 v1.0.0 a068026b4a060e822892a64d5107fb58c45743ef v1.2.0 8610c92442d125f165dc84e4a96f5cbc9b240484 v2.0.0 a374953c636bd91ea40b2d1e31af5405b90e8bf8 v2.2.0 bf330b5e3c471d0b67737c4822b0174ef4f89bed v2.4.0 13a80dffb74939e292b6e90e5d79dd26d577489f v2.6.0 4e9b4bc7a660962ae5f04f939469263b91cf95c2 Rob
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-05-11 01:00 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-11 02:50 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-05-11 09:10 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-05-11 18:20 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-05-12 04:00 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-12 09:50 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-05-12 17:00 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-05-12 18:40 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-05-12 19:50 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-05-13 19:30 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-05-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-05-13 06:20 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-13 11:40 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-05-13 19:20 +0200
Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-12 18:50 +0200
csiph-web