Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1639126

Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?

From Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?
Date 2017-05-11 02:50 +0200
Message-ID <tFKsN-7Fb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tFIKm-6A2-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas Gleixner appears to have a tree with all of those same commits
> except with the BKrev tags stripped out.

That's the best import - so use that tree by Thomas, and just use the
git revision numbers in it (and say "tglx's linux-history tree" or
something).

             Linus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-05-11 01:00 +0200
  Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-11 02:50 +0200
    Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-05-11 09:10 +0200
      Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-05-11 18:20 +0200

csiph-web