Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1635866

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions

From Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions
Date 2017-05-04 18:10 +0200
Message-ID <tDruh-5So-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tDcvf-4cE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDnK1-3f7-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 02:03:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ static void pinctrl_generic_free_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> >  		radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, indices[i]);
> >  		devm_kfree(pctldev->dev, group);
> >  	}
> > +	kfree(indices);
> 
> We use devm_kfree for other allocations done here, maybe we can just
> have the same thing here? We would be consistant, and we would still
> keep the resource tracking.

It doesn't make any sense to use the managed functions from the
release functions and if you're always matching devm_kmalloc() with
devm_kfree(), the only thing it'd do is confusing its readers.

And the function in question just looks weird to me - give up on
freeing resources if memory allocation fails?  And why call
devm_kfree() on objects which are being released anyway?  Or if the
group can be released w/o the device being detached, why use devm
allocations on the members at all?

As for removal, can't it just call radix_tree_iter_delete() while
iterating?  Why allocate memory to iterate and store all indices and
to look them up again and delete them?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-05-04 02:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-05-04 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-04 18:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-05-05 02:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-05-05 22:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-06 00:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-11 16:10 +0200
    Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> - 2017-05-11 16:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-11 16:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-05-11 17:30 +0200

csiph-web