Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1636350
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks |
| Date | 2017-05-05 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tDKwW-1FQ-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tD44G-73B-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDK3T-1gk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDK3T-1gk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDK3T-1gk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:28:09PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > I don't think > > it's a real use case to have ticket spinlocks and queued rwlocks > > There's nothing wrong with that combination. In fact, we merged qrwlock > much earlier than qspinlock. ... and that's almost certainly the direction we'll go on arm64 too, not least because the former are a lot easier to grok. Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-05 14:00 +0200
Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-05 14:30 +0200
Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-05 17:40 +0200
csiph-web