Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks
Date	2017-05-05 14:00 +0200
Message-ID	<tDK3T-1gk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tD44G-73B-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDK3T-1gk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDK3T-1gk-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:28:09PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> I don't think
> it's a real use case to have ticket spinlocks and queued rwlocks

There's nothing wrong with that combination. In fact, we merged qrwlock
much earlier than qspinlock.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued  spinlocks and rw-locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-05 14:00 +0200
  Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued  spinlocks and rw-locks Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-05 14:30 +0200
    Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued  spinlocks and rw-locks Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web