Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1636282

Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API

From Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API
Date 2017-05-05 12:00 +0200
Message-ID <tDIbM-8pT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tDlfd-1wD-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDEUy-6lR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDFxf-6U1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDHIJ-8ec-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 10:06 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
[...]
>> I think with this semantic change, our proposals can reach common
>> grounds
>> and satisfy a wider group of users (i.e. filesystem developers).
>>
>> Christoph also suggested a similar treatment to typedef guid_t to
>> struct uuid_le.
>> I don't know the use cases enough to comment on that.
>
> We may go this way. But I wouldn't prevent current users of uuid_le to
> continue using it without conversion (it may be done case by case after
> we settle an API)
>
> So, summarize what Christoph said it will look like
>
> typedef uuid_be uuid_t;
> typedef uuid_le guid_t
>
> uuid_cmp() / uuid_copy() / uuid_to_bin() / etc
> guid_cmp() / guid_copy() / guid_to_bin() / etc
>
> Correct? Christoph?
>

That looks right to me.

To complete the picture for folks not cc'ed on my patches,
xfs use case suggests there is also justification for the additional helpers:

uuid_is_null() / uuid_equal()
guid_is_null() / guid_equal()

Cheers,
Amir.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-04 11:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-04 11:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-04 14:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> - 2017-05-04 14:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2017-05-04 17:30 +0200
  Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-05-05 08:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-05-05 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 09:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-05-05 09:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-05 11:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 12:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-05-05 12:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 12:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2017-05-09 10:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-09 10:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> - 2017-05-10 03:30 +0200

csiph-web