Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1634101
| From | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. |
| Date | 2017-05-02 05:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCwPn-Wb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <tyEVb-5ck-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzBse-8uT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzNWq-ba-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCbKV-4Lj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCkbv-1IO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, May 01 2017, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 04/30/2017 11:00 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 24 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:51:01AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: >>>> >>>> I was following the existing practice exemplified by >>>> bioset_create_nobvec(). >>> >>> Which is pretty ugly to start with.. >> >> That is a matter of personal taste. >> As such, it is up to the maintainer to change it if they want it >> changed. >> >>> >>>> By not changing the signature of the function, I can avoid touching >>>> quite a few places where it is called. >>> >>> There are 13 callers of bioset_create and one caller of >>> bioset_create_nobvec, and your series touches many of those. >>> >>> So just adding a flags argument to bioset_create and passing >>> BIOSET_NEED_BVECS and BIOSET_NEED_RESUER flags to it doesn't seem >>> to much of an effort, and it's going to create a much nicer and easier >>> to extend interface. >> >> If someone else submitted a patch to discard bioset_create_nobvec in >> favour of BIOSET_NEED_BVECS and got it accepted, then I would rebase my >> series on that. As it is, I'm basing my patches on the style currently >> present in the tree. >> >> Of course, if Jens says he'll only take my patches if I change to style >> to match your preference, I'll do that. > > I generally tend to prefer tree wide cleanups to improve our APIs, even > if it does cause an extra bit of pain. Would you mind doing that as a > prep patch? OK, will do. I have rebased and fixed up a couple of issues. Will repost shortly. Thanks, NeilBrown
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-05-01 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-05-01 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-05-02 05:40 +0200
csiph-web