Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1633678

Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional.

From Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional.
Date 2017-05-01 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <tCkbv-1IO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tyd8C-4Wq-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyEVb-5ck-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzBse-8uT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzNWq-ba-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCbKV-4Lj-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/30/2017 11:00 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:51:01AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> I was following the existing practice exemplified by
>>> bioset_create_nobvec().
>>
>> Which is pretty ugly to start with..
> 
> That is a matter of personal taste.
> As such, it is up to the maintainer to change it if they want it
> changed.
> 
>>
>>> By not changing the signature of the function, I can avoid touching
>>> quite a few places where it is called.
>>
>> There are 13 callers of bioset_create and one caller of
>> bioset_create_nobvec, and your series touches many of those.
>>
>> So just adding a flags argument to bioset_create and passing
>> BIOSET_NEED_BVECS and BIOSET_NEED_RESUER flags to it doesn't seem
>> to much of an effort, and it's going to create a much nicer and easier
>> to extend interface.
> 
> If someone else submitted a patch to discard bioset_create_nobvec in
> favour of BIOSET_NEED_BVECS and got it accepted, then I would rebase my
> series on that.  As it is, I'm basing my patches on the style currently
> present in the tree.
> 
> Of course, if Jens says he'll only take my patches if I change to style
> to match your preference, I'll do that.

I generally tend to prefer tree wide cleanups to improve our APIs, even
if it does cause an extra bit of pain. Would you mind doing that as a
prep patch?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-05-01 07:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-05-01 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 02/11] blk: make the bioset rescue_workqueue optional. NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-05-02 05:40 +0200

csiph-web