Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1634629
| From | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] md: Fine-tuning for some function implementations |
| Date | 2017-05-02 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCNGx-3EW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tCGYp-7Na-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, May 02 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 16:12:34 +0200 > > Some update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (6): > Replace seven seq_printf() calls by seq_putc() > Replace 17 seq_printf() calls by seq_puts() Why does anyone care whether printf or putc/puts is used? Really it doesn't matter *at* *all*. I don't object to the patch but if it would up to me I probably wouldn't bother applying it it either. Sometimes I just want to "print" something and I don't want to care whether it is a constant string or a single-byte constant string, or something more general. I see these changes as worse than white-space fixes. NeilBrown > Adjust four function calls together with a variable assignment > Use seq_puts() in faulty_status() > Adjust six function calls together with a variable assignment in faulty_status() > Add some spaces for better code readability > > drivers/md/faulty.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/md/md.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.12.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/6] md: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 6/6] md: Add some spaces for better code readability SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-02 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/6] md: Fine-tuning for some function implementations NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> - 2017-05-02 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/6] md: Fine-tuning for some function implementations Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovsky@suse.cz> - 2017-05-03 09:40 +0200
csiph-web