Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1633161
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently |
| Date | 2017-04-28 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBljj-4Iv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tAMYi-6lN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tB6Nk-35H-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday, April 28, 2017 01:30:20 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> For all frequent late stage acpi_get_table() clone invocations, we should
> only fix them altogether, otherwise, excessive acpi_put_table() could
> unexpectedly unmap the table used by the other users. Thus the current plan
> is to fix all acpi_get_table() clones together or to fix none of them.
I honestly don't think that fixing none of them is a valid option here.
> This prevents kernel developers from improving the late stage code quality
> without waiting for the ACPICA upstream to improve first.
>
> This patch adds a mechanism to stop decrementing validation count to
> prevent the table unmapping operations so that acpi_put_table() balance
> fixes can be done independently to each others.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> index 7abe665..b517bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> @@ -445,12 +445,18 @@ void acpi_tb_put_table(struct acpi_table_desc *table_desc)
>
> ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_tb_put_table);
>
> - if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) {
> + if ((table_desc->validation_count + 1) == 0) {
This means that validation_count has reached the maximum value, right?
> ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO,
> - "Table %p, Validation count is zero before decrement\n",
> + "Table %p, Validation count is about to expire, decrement is unsafe\n",
> table_desc));
So why is it unsafe to decrement it?
> return_VOID;
> }
> + if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) {
> + ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
> + "Table %p, Validation count is zero before decrement\n",
> + table_desc));
> + return_VOID;
> + }
> table_desc->validation_count--;
>
> if (table_desc->validation_count == 0) {
>
Thanks,
Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-27 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-28 00:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 03:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 06:00 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/4] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 07:30 +0200
[PATCH v3 1/4] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 07:40 +0200
[PATCH v3 4/4] ACPI: Fix memory mapping leaks in current sysfs dumpable ACPI tables support Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 07:40 +0200
[PATCH v3 3/4] ACPI: sysfs: Fix acpi_get_table() leak Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 07:40 +0200
[PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-04-28 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-28 23:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-04 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-05-04 17:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-05 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-05-05 22:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-09 04:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 3/4] ACPI: sysfs: Fix acpi_get_table() leak Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-09 08:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 4/4] ACPI: Fix memory mapping leaks in current sysfs dumpable ACPI tables support Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-09 08:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/4] ACPICA: Tables: Add mechanism to allow to balance late stage acpi_get_table() independently Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-09 08:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/4] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a too early mechanism enabling Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> - 2017-05-09 08:00 +0200
csiph-web