Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1578178
| From | Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce |
| Date | 2017-02-10 06:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t9bMJ-7xp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t8SAp-3UH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8TPQ-4PF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8UCd-56L-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017年02月09日 18:49, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've got the following report while running syzkaller fuzzer on mmotm >>> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git) >>> remotes/mmotm/auto-latest ee4ba7533626ba7bf2f8b992266467ac9fdc045e: >>> >> [...] >> >>> other info that might help us debug this: >>> >>> Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: >>> >>> CPU0 CPU1 >>> ---- ---- >>> lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); >>> local_irq_disable(); >>> lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock); >>> lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); >>> <Interrupt> >>> lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock); >>> >> Thanks a lot for the testing. >> >> Looks like we could address this by using skb_array_consume_bh() instead. >> >> Could you pls verify if the following patch works? > No, I can't test it, sorry. This happened once on bots. And bots > currently test only upstream versions. > > No problem, will try to test my self. Thanks
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 09:50 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 11:10 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 12:00 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:00 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 19:10 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:20 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-10 06:20 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:20 +0100
Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-10 06:20 +0100
csiph-web