Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1577824

Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've got the following report while running syzkaller fuzzer on mmotm
> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
> >> remotes/mmotm/auto-latest ee4ba7533626ba7bf2f8b992266467ac9fdc045e:
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>
> >> other info that might help us debug this:
> >>
> >>  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> >>
> >>        CPU0                    CPU1
> >>        ----                    ----
> >>   lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock);
> >>                                local_irq_disable();
> >>                                lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock);
> >>                                lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock);
> >>   <Interrupt>
> >>     lock(&(&r->producer_lock)->rlock);
> >>
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the testing.
> >
> > Looks like we could address this by using skb_array_consume_bh() instead.
> >
> > Could you pls verify if the following patch works?
> 
> No, I can't test it, sorry. This happened once on bots. And bots
> currently test only upstream versions.

Which trees are tested? Will linux-next help?

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index 8a7d6b9..a97c00d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile)
> >  {
> >         struct sk_buff *skb;
> >
> > -       while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL)
> > +       while ((skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL)
> >                 kfree_skb(skb);
> >
> >         skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue);
> > @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock,
> >         struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> >         int error = 0;
> >
> > -       skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array);
> > +       skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array);
> >         if (skb)
> >                 goto out;
> >         if (noblock) {
> > @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock,
> >         current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> >
> >         while (1) {
> > -               skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array);
> > +               skb = skb_array_consume_bh(&tfile->tx_array);
> >                 if (skb)
> >                         break;
> >                 if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 09:50 +0100
  Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 11:10 +0100
    Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 12:00 +0100
      Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:00 +0100
        Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in skb_array_produce Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-02-09 19:10 +0100
          Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:20 +0100
      Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-10 06:20 +0100
    Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-02-09 19:20 +0100
      Re: net: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected in  skb_array_produce Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-02-10 06:20 +0100

csiph-web