Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1577928

Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10

From Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10
Date 2017-02-09 21:20 +0100
Message-ID <t93ma-2fX-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t8GpA-4sD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8GpA-4sD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t8OGt-1hO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t91u2-15t-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:09:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Ashok, Keith]
> 
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:06:48AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:22:56PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > Bjorn Helgaas (1):
> > >       Revert "PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports"
> > 
> > What's the rationale for reverting this?
> > 
> > You've received patches to fix the issue on both affected machines,
> > so a revert seems unnecessary:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9557113/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9562007/
> 
> I don't think we've gotten to the root cause of the problem yet,
> and I don't want to throw in fixes at the last minute without a better
> understanding of it.
> 
> PCIe hotplug hardware is not very complicated, it hasn't changed in
> many years, and at least for the Intel hardware in question, is
> generally pretty well-tested with Windows.  So I want to be careful
> about asserting that this new piece of hardware is broken.

I apologize: I had quirks on the brain, but neither of the patches
above is device-specific.  So neither is claiming broken hardware.

However, 9557113 claims we get unwanted PME interrupts if the slot is
occupied when we suspend to D3hot.  This is what I want to explore
further, because that hardware behavior doesn't really make sense to
me.

9562007 apparently fixes something, but at this point it's a debugging
patch (no changelog or signed-off-by) so not a candidate for tossing
into v4.10 at this late date.

Bjorn

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-02-08 20:50 +0100
  Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2017-02-09 05:40 +0100
    Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 19:20 +0100
      Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2017-02-09 19:30 +0100
        Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2017-02-09 19:50 +0100
      Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 21:20 +0100
        Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-10 14:20 +0100
        Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2017-02-11 03:50 +0100
          Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2017-02-11 08:20 +0100
          Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2017-02-12 20:10 +0100
            Re: [GIT PULL] PCI fixes for v4.10 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-02-13 13:20 +0100

csiph-web