[PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase

From	Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase
Date	2017-02-07 10:20 +0100
Message-ID	<t8a6l-VT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t7t1o-6zN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7zTb-2uy-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7zTb-2uy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7NWa-3aZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <t81w6-3FY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

07.02.2017 03:04, Andrew Morton пишет:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300 Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
>
>> So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
>> and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
>> the archive link:
>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
>> doesn't work.
>> There is definitely something wrong here.
>>
>> So did they pass into a stable ML?
>> If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
>> Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?
> I have a copy of [1/2] because I was on cc.  I cannot locate a copy of
> [2/2].  Please cc Oleg on signal-related changes.
Thanks for taking these!
2/2 had the CCs to

CC: Shuah Khan<shuah@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar<mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski<luto@kernel.org>
CC:linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
CC:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC:trivial@kernel.org

as it only changed the self-test.
Obviously I am getting spam-blocked somewhere.
I generate the CC list with get_maintainers.pl. Is this
the right thing to do?
Oleg was CCed on [1/2] as get_maintainers.pl mentioned
him.

I am attaching the [2/2] to this e-mail.
If this doesn't work, I can try to re-send it with more
CCs, but it will likely be blocked again.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2 0/2] sigaltstack: SS_AUTODISARM fixes Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-02-05 12:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for CONFIG_COMPAT Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-02-05 19:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for CONFIG_COMPAT Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-02-06 10:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for  CONFIG_COMPAT Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-07 01:10 +0100
        [PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-02-07 10:20 +0100

csiph-web