Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process()

From	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process()
Date	2017-02-09 02:40 +0100
Message-ID	<t8LSh-7Ue-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<t6Thg-7ai-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7O5P-3el-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t82Vc-4qF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t890B-gF-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:03:43AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 07-02-17 02:37:02, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > From a quick check I do not see any leak there either.
> > 
> > Then in that case what about:
> 
> This just disables the kmemleak altogether which doesn't sound like a
> good idea to me.

Only for this case, but if that is also not desirable let us debug further.
That or I think we could perhaps massage code to make it clearer to kmemleak
things are good.

  Luis

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

kmemleak splat on copy_process() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-03 22:10 +0100
  Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 10:50 +0100
    Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-07 02:40 +0100
      Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-02-07 09:10 +0100
        Re: kmemleak splat on copy_process() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-09 02:40 +0100

csiph-web