Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1575031

Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on x86_64

From "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on x86_64
Date 2017-02-06 18:50 +0100
Message-ID <t7VAl-87K-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t7eOK-5xq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7jOp-x1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7soG-66H-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:33:25AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:22:55PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Upstream (v4.10-rc6-193-ga572a1b99948), the same command yields no error at all:
> 
> That's because you tested Linus' merge commit of the branch which fixed that :-)
> 
> IOW, the fix should be:
> 
> aaaec6fc7554 ("x86/irq: Make irq activate operations symmetric")
> 
> It is on its way to stable too, as we speak.

I've taken this patch and applied it on top of next-20170203
and confirm it fixes the regression. I've also tested next-20170206
which has the fix and confirm that boots as well.

Do we have any test units which can kick off regularly to test against such
type of regression in the future or is it not worth it?

Thanks Boris!

  Luis

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on x86_64 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 21:10 +0100
  Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-05 00:20 +0100
    Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-05 00:30 +0100
    Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-05 15:10 +0100
  Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-02-05 02:30 +0100
    Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-02-05 11:40 +0100
      Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-02-05 16:10 +0100
      Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-06 18:50 +0100
        Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on  x86_64 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-02-07 01:10 +0100

csiph-web