Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1573248

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

From Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Date 2017-02-03 17:40 +0100
Message-ID <t6P3X-47k-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <t6Nvb-2PE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6NOy-3bO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6O7V-3sD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6Org-3Ei-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6Orh-3Ei-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality.
> > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if
> > you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand,
> > potentially without any in-tree user.
> 
> Sure, I'm more interested in supporting MSI on my HIDMA code rather than
> MSI on SMMUv3.
> 
> HIDMA MSI patches were merged November 2016.
> 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commits/master/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> 
> Commits on Nov 3, 2016
>  @vinodkoul
> dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add MSI support for interrupts  …
> Sinan Kaya committed with vinodkoul on Oct 21, 2016
> 
> I tested the first 12 patches of this series against HIDMA and provided
> my tested-by.

Ok, we should have split this series before then. Now, if:

(1) Marc is ok with patches [4-7,10,12]
(2) Your HIDMA MSI does not depend on Agustin patch series to work
(3) Rafael is ok with a pull request at -rc7 (ie I won't be able to
    send it before then since I want to test it)

I will send a pull request to Rafael for patches [1-12] on Monday.

If any of (1)-(2)-(3) does not hold it is going to be v4.12, a
single driver is not the end of the world (and this will give us
time to add support for SMMUv3 MSI that this series can't handle).

Thanks,
Lorenzo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 16:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 17:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 17:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 18:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2017-02-04 05:10 +0100

csiph-web