Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1573218

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

From Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Date 2017-02-03 17:00 +0100
Message-ID <t6Org-3Ei-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t0Y9Y-4vs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6Nvb-2PE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6NOy-3bO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t6O7V-3sD-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization ARM Ltd

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/02/17 15:35, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>>>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>>>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
>>>> msi support.
>>>>
>>>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
>>>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
>>>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
>>>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).
>>>>
>>>
>>> I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces
>>> of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in
>>> due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions.
>>>
>>> Can we merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base
>>> implementation comes in place?
>>
>> Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we
>> talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series?
>>
> 
> I was talking about patches V8 00-12 of this particular one. 
> 
> [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
> 
> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality.

Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if
you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand,
potentially without any in-tree user.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 16:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 17:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 17:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-03 18:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2017-02-04 05:10 +0100

csiph-web