Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1570788

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009

From Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009
Date 2017-01-31 15:40 +0100
Message-ID <t5HLb-1Ot-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t5tfb-1B3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5tfb-1B3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <t5G2K-Kr-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:42:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:08:17PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > During a TLB invalidate sequence targeting the inner shareable domain,
> > Falkor may prematurely complete the DSB before all loads and stores using
> > the old translation are observed. Instruction fetches are not subject to
> > the conditions of this erratum. If the original code sequence includes
> > multiple TLB invalidate instructions followed by a single DSB, onle one of
> > the TLB instructions needs to be repeated to work around this erratum.
> > While the erratum only applies to cases in which the TLBI specifies the
> > inner-shareable domain (*IS form of TLBI) and the DSB is ISH form or
> > stronger (OSH, SYS), this changes applies the workaround overabundantly--
> > to local TLBI, DSB NSH sequences as well--for simplicity.
> > 
> > Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
> 
> This looks simple, self-contained, and correct, so FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Catalin/Will, since we may see a documentation conflict against a timer
> erratum, would you be hapyp to pick up [1] first, fixing up this patch
> as necessary?
> 
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/484594.html

I replied over there, but I'd rather just take all the silicon-errata.txt
changes because I don't see them as being dependent on the rest of the
series.

For this patch specifically, I can't merge it until you're happy with the
other workaround, since they conflict.

Will

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-31 00:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-01-31 13:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-31 15:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-31 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009 Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-31 17:20 +0100

csiph-web