Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1569283
| From | Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() |
| Date | 2017-01-29 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t55cR-3Mj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t4gN5-5TS-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <t4ZqN-cH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t51sC-1rB-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:48:39PM +0530, Nayna wrote: > > > On 01/29/2017 08:10 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > This patch add validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation to avoid > > > access beyond response buffer length. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > This validation looks broken to me. > > > > > --- > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > > > index 4aad84c..02c1ea7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > > > @@ -1008,9 +1008,13 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > > struct tpm2_pcr_selection pcr_selection; > > > struct tpm_buf buf; > > > void *marker; > > > - unsigned int count = 0; > > > + void *end; > > > + void *pcr_select_offset; > > > + unsigned int count; > > > + u32 sizeof_pcr_selection; > > > + u32 resp_len; > > > > Very cosmetic but we almos almost universally use the acronym 'rsp' in > > the TPM driver. > > Sure will update. > > > > > > int rc; > > > - int i; > > > + int i = 0; > > > > Why do you need to initialize it? > > Because in out: count is replaced with i. > And it is replaced because now for loop can break even before reaching > count, because of new buffer checks. > > > > > > > > rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY); > > > if (rc) > > > @@ -1034,15 +1038,29 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > > } > > > > > > marker = &buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9]; > > > + > > > + resp_len = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[2]); > > > + end = &buf.data[resp_len]; > > > > What if the response contains larger length than the buffer size? > > Isn't this check need to be done in tpm_transmit_cmd for all responses ? > Though, it seems it is not done there as well. > > And to understand what do we expect max buffer length. PAGE_SIZE or > TPM_BUFSIZE ? Oops. You are correct it is done there: if (len != be32_to_cpu(header->length)) return -EFAULT; So need to do this. /Jarkko /Jarkko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-27 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-29 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-29 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-29 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-30 04:00 +0100
csiph-web