Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1569206

Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation()

From Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation()
Date 2017-01-29 16:20 +0100
Message-ID <t4ZqN-cH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t4gN5-5TS-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> This patch add validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation to avoid
> access beyond response buffer length.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This validation looks broken to me.

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> index 4aad84c..02c1ea7 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> @@ -1008,9 +1008,13 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  	struct tpm2_pcr_selection pcr_selection;
>  	struct tpm_buf buf;
>  	void *marker;
> -	unsigned int count = 0;
> +	void *end;
> +	void *pcr_select_offset;
> +	unsigned int count;
> +	u32 sizeof_pcr_selection;
> +	u32 resp_len;

Very cosmetic but we almos almost universally use the acronym 'rsp' in
the TPM driver.

>  	int rc;
> -	int i;
> +	int i = 0;

Why do you need to initialize it?

>  
>  	rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY);
>  	if (rc)
> @@ -1034,15 +1038,29 @@ static ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  	}
>  
>  	marker = &buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 9];
> +
> +	resp_len = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[2]);
> +	end = &buf.data[resp_len];

What if the response contains larger length than the buffer size?

> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		pcr_select_offset = marker +
> +			offsetof(struct tpm2_pcr_selection, size_of_select);
> +		if (pcr_select_offset >= end) {
> +			rc = -EFAULT;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		memcpy(&pcr_selection, marker, sizeof(pcr_selection));
>  		chip->active_banks[i] = be16_to_cpu(pcr_selection.hash_alg);
> -		marker = marker + sizeof(struct tpm2_pcr_selection);
> +		sizeof_pcr_selection = sizeof(pcr_selection.hash_alg) +
> +			sizeof(pcr_selection.size_of_select) +
> +			sizeof(u8) * pcr_selection.size_of_select;

Remove "sizeof(u8) * ".

> +		marker = marker + sizeof_pcr_selection;
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	if (count < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
> -		chip->active_banks[count] = TPM2_ALG_ERROR;
> +	if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks))
> +		chip->active_banks[i] = TPM2_ALG_ERROR;
>  
>  	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

I'm sorry but this commit is changing too much. You need to redo the
whole commit and resend the patch set with these fixes. You can keep
Reviewed-by and Tested-by in 1/2 but have to remove them from 2/2.

/Jarkko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-27 16:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in  tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-29 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in  tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-29 18:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in  tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-29 22:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] tpm: add buffer access validation in  tpm2_get_pcr_allocation() Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-30 04:00 +0100

csiph-web