Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1567656

Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages

From Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages
Date 2017-01-26 20:30 +0100
Message-ID <t3XU5-2Qh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t3rhv-7QP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3FNw-iY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3PMS-6fb-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:47:32AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:08:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +	for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps) {
> > > +		struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_drain, cpu);
> > > +		INIT_WORK(work, drain_local_pages_wq);
> > 
> > It's strange to repeatedly run INIT_WORK() in this fashion. 
> > Overwriting an atomic_t which should already be zero, initializing a
> > list_head which should already be in the initialized state...
> > 
> > Can we instead do this a single time in init code?
> > 
> 
> INIT_WORK does different things depending on whether LOCKDEP is enabled or
> not and also whether object debugging is enabled. I'd worry that it's not
> functionally equivalent or some future change would break the assumptions
> about what INIT_WORK does internally. The init cost is there, but it's
> insignicant in comparison to the whole workqueue operation or the old
> cost of sending IPIs for that matter.

Both initing once or per each invocation are perfectly valid and
guaranteed to work.  idk, I don't have a strong opinion hereag.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining  per-cpu pages Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-01-25 09:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for  draining per-cpu pages Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-25 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-01-25 10:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for  draining per-cpu pages Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-26 01:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for  draining per-cpu pages Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-01-26 11:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for  draining per-cpu pages Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-26 20:30 +0100

csiph-web