Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567656
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages |
| Date | 2017-01-26 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3XU5-2Qh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t3rhv-7QP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3FNw-iY-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3PMS-6fb-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:47:32AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:08:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps) {
> > > + struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_drain, cpu);
> > > + INIT_WORK(work, drain_local_pages_wq);
> >
> > It's strange to repeatedly run INIT_WORK() in this fashion.
> > Overwriting an atomic_t which should already be zero, initializing a
> > list_head which should already be in the initialized state...
> >
> > Can we instead do this a single time in init code?
> >
>
> INIT_WORK does different things depending on whether LOCKDEP is enabled or
> not and also whether object debugging is enabled. I'd worry that it's not
> functionally equivalent or some future change would break the assumptions
> about what INIT_WORK does internally. The init cost is there, but it's
> insignicant in comparison to the whole workqueue operation or the old
> cost of sending IPIs for that matter.
Both initing once or per each invocation are perfectly valid and
guaranteed to work. idk, I don't have a strong opinion hereag.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-01-25 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-01-25 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-01-25 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-01-26 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-01-26 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Use static global work_struct for draining per-cpu pages Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-01-26 20:30 +0100
csiph-web