Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1567461
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 |
| Date | 2017-01-26 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3TdM-8u9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <t1o4r-3Xc-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2NDr-7uE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3yM2-46E-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3Kk9-2UB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3KWS-3p6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> >>>> Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? >>> >>> Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and >>> defconfig. >>> >>>> >>>> If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up >>>> a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test. >>>> >>>> If there is something else that needs to be done let me know. >>>> >>>> [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git >>>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/ >>> >>> If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool >>> front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be >>> great. With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to >>> just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts. >>> >> >> Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested >> in the following breakage as well (seen in -next). >> >> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata': >> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables' >> >> Reported on kerneltests.org. > > Thanks Guenter, > > Is this for me of Paul? > Paul, sorry. Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-19 06:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-19 17:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 23:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 15:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-25 17:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-01-26 06:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 06:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-01-26 15:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-26 16:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 06:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 16:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-26 17:30 +0100
csiph-web