Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1567117

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

From Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19
Date 2017-01-26 06:40 +0100
Message-ID <t3KWS-3p6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t1dLH-5Lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <t1o4r-3Xc-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <t2NDr-7uE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3yM2-46E-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <t3Kk9-2UB-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > 
> > > Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?
> > 
> > Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and
> > defconfig.
> > 
> > > 
> > > If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
> > > a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.
> > > 
> > > If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.
> > > 
> > > [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/
> > 
> > If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool
> > front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be
> > great.  With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to
> > just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts.
> > 
> 
> Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested
> in the following breakage as well (seen in -next).
> 
> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata':
> /opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'
> 
> Reported on kerneltests.org.

Thanks Guenter,

Is this for me of Paul?

You reported score above, but I think probably this is also impacting
openrisc.

Anyway,
I think this is due to Puals changes which separated out extable from
module.  traps.c in score and openrisc use search_exception_tables and
include <linux/module.h> to get it.

I did see Paul post a patch to fix traps.c too,

This should be fixed by today.

-Stafford

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-01-19 06:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-19 17:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 23:10 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 15:20 +0100
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-25 17:40 +0100
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-01-26 06:00 +0100
          Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 06:40 +0100
            Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-01-26 15:30 +0100
              Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-26 16:00 +0100
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 06:50 +0100
          Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 16:10 +0100
            Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2017-01-26 17:30 +0100

csiph-web