Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1565248
| From | Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface |
| Date | 2017-01-23 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t2S0q-1AD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sYaqZ-5m6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYaqZ-5m6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0fPA-14g-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0MLv-5CY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0Vc6-2mj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Shivappa Vikas wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> This interface is really crap. The natural way to express it is: >>> >>> Requested Bandwidth = X % >> >> I wanted to do it this way which did seem more intuitive but the issue is with >> the non-linear scale which the hardware does not guarantee a particular >> percentage for a particular value. Or we don't know the curve for delay value >> vs. actual b/w throttled. >> >> ex: in non linear scale , the granularity is 2^n. >> Max : 512 >> >> Say a value of 256 is not guaranteed to have 50% or even follow a curve where >> we can calculate the corresponding percentage. > > The question is whether this non linear scale thing is just a first > implementation attempt and any sane hardware in the future will use the > percentage value (which is an approximation as well). > > If that non-linear scale is not going to be prevalent, then we really can > live with the fallout of a particular CPU type. > > If it's going to stay, then Intel should be able to provide simple tables > which give us the required information for a particular CPU model. By sample table - does this mean we can map a throttle value in non-linear scale to its percentage ? Thanks, Vikas > > Thanks, > > tglx >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-18 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-01-18 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-23 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-01-23 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-24 23:20 +0100
csiph-web