Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1565248

Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface

From Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface
Date 2017-01-23 20:00 +0100
Message-ID <t2S0q-1AD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sYaqZ-5m6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sYaqZ-5m6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0fPA-14g-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0MLv-5CY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0Vc6-2mj-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Shivappa Vikas wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> This interface is really crap. The natural way to express it is:
>>>
>>>     Requested Bandwidth = X %
>>
>> I wanted to do it this way which did seem more intuitive but the issue is with
>> the non-linear scale which the hardware does not guarantee a particular
>> percentage for a particular value. Or we don't know the curve for delay value
>> vs. actual b/w throttled.
>>
>> ex: in non linear scale , the granularity is 2^n.
>> Max : 512
>>
>> Say a value of 256 is not guaranteed to have 50% or even follow a curve where
>> we can calculate the corresponding percentage.
>
> The question is whether this non linear scale thing is just a first
> implementation attempt and any sane hardware in the future will use the
> percentage value (which is an approximation as well).
>
> If that non-linear scale is not going to be prevalent, then we really can
> live with the fallout of a particular CPU type.
>
> If it's going to stay, then Intel should be able to provide simple tables
> which give us the required information for a particular CPU model.

By sample table - does this mean we can map a throttle value in non-linear 
scale to its percentage ?

Thanks,
Vikas

>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w  allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-18 02:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w  allocation user interface Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-01-18 11:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w  allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-23 20:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w  allocation user interface Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-01-23 20:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w  allocation user interface Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com> - 2017-01-24 23:20 +0100

csiph-web