Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1561844

Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write()

From SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write()
Date 2017-01-18 15:30 +0100
Message-ID <t0Zpn-5cx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <t0WUy-3AT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0X4d-3E5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0YD0-4Gk-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> A local variable was set to an error code in two cases before a concrete
>> error situation was detected. Thus move the corresponding assignment into
>> an if branch to indicate a software failure there.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Acked-by: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>

Thanks for your positive feedback.


Unfortunately, I have got the impression that this update step is inappropriate
so far because the suggested change for the handling of the error code “-EFAULT”
can be incomplete (or a bit too much).

Which implementation would you prefer?

A) Keep the variable assignment before the check for the call of
   the function “copy_from_user”

B) Add an assignment in another condition branch at the end.

 		res = (int) ret1;
+	} else {
+		res = -EFAULT;
 	}

Regards,
Markus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/4] alpha: Fine-tuning for five function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 12:50 +0100
  [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in  srm_env_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res"  in srm_env_proc_write() Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> - 2017-01-18 14:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in  srm_env_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 15:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res"  in srm_env_proc_write() Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-01-18 15:20 +0100
      Re: alpha: Checking source code positions for the setting of error  codes SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 17:00 +0100
        Re: alpha: Checking source code positions for the setting of error  codes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-01-18 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res"  in srm_env_proc_write() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-01-19 01:50 +0100
  [PATCH 3/4] alpha: Return directly after a failed copy_from_user() or  getname() in two functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100
  [PATCH 2/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "error" in  osf_utsname() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100

csiph-web