Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1561844
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() |
| Date | 2017-01-18 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0Zpn-5cx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <t0WUy-3AT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0X4d-3E5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <t0YD0-4Gk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> A local variable was set to an error code in two cases before a concrete
>> error situation was detected. Thus move the corresponding assignment into
>> an if branch to indicate a software failure there.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Acked-by: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Thanks for your positive feedback.
Unfortunately, I have got the impression that this update step is inappropriate
so far because the suggested change for the handling of the error code “-EFAULT”
can be incomplete (or a bit too much).
Which implementation would you prefer?
A) Keep the variable assignment before the check for the call of
the function “copy_from_user”
B) Add an assignment in another condition branch at the end.
res = (int) ret1;
+ } else {
+ res = -EFAULT;
}
Regards,
Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/4] alpha: Fine-tuning for five function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 12:50 +0100
[PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> - 2017-01-18 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-01-18 15:20 +0100
Re: alpha: Checking source code positions for the setting of error codes SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 17:00 +0100
Re: alpha: Checking source code positions for the setting of error codes Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-01-18 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "res" in srm_env_proc_write() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-01-19 01:50 +0100
[PATCH 3/4] alpha: Return directly after a failed copy_from_user() or getname() in two functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100
[PATCH 2/4] alpha: Move two assignments for the variable "error" in osf_utsname() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-01-18 13:00 +0100
csiph-web