Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1514676
| From | Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times |
| Date | 2016-11-03 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szt3Q-6jb-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <szt3P-6jb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
i_times of inode will be set with current system time which can be
configured through 'date', so it's not safe to judge dnode block as
garbage data depend on i_times.
Now, we have used enhanced 'cp_ver + cp' crc method to verify valid
dnode block, so I expect recoverying invalid dnode is almost not
possible.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 31 +------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index d2ba4da..62523b2 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -196,32 +196,6 @@ static void recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
ino_of_node(page), name);
}
-static bool is_same_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage)
-{
- struct f2fs_inode *ri = F2FS_INODE(ipage);
- struct timespec disk;
-
- if (!IS_INODE(ipage))
- return true;
-
- disk.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(ri->i_ctime);
- disk.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(ri->i_ctime_nsec);
- if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime, &disk) > 0)
- return false;
-
- disk.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(ri->i_atime);
- disk.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(ri->i_atime_nsec);
- if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &disk) > 0)
- return false;
-
- disk.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(ri->i_mtime);
- disk.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(ri->i_mtime_nsec);
- if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime, &disk) > 0)
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
{
struct curseg_info *curseg;
@@ -248,10 +222,7 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
goto next;
entry = get_fsync_inode(head, ino_of_node(page));
- if (entry) {
- if (!is_same_inode(entry->inode, page))
- goto next;
- } else {
+ if (!entry) {
if (IS_INODE(page) && is_dent_dnode(page)) {
err = recover_inode_page(sbi, page);
if (err)
--
2.10.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix wrong i_atime recovery Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-11-03 17:30 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-11-03 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-11-03 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2016-11-04 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-11-05 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> - 2016-11-05 04:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: don't skip recovering inode depend on i_times Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-11-05 08:10 +0100
csiph-web