Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1509094
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature |
| Date | 2016-10-26 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <swuz7-2VL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sutHb-52m-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sutHc-52m-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <swu66-2w2-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <swuz7-2VL-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:49:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > + /* > > > + * ITMT capability automatically enables ITMT > > > + * scheduling for small systems (single node). > > > + */ > > > + if (topology_num_packages() == 1) > > > + sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled = 1; > > > > I really hate this. This is policy and the kernel should not impose > > policy. Why would I like to have this enforced on my single socket XEON > > server? > > So this really wants to be enabled by default; otherwise nobody will use > this, and it really does help single threaded workloads. Fair enough. Then this wants to be documented. > There were reservations on the multi-socket case of ITMT, maybe it would > help to spell those out in great detail here. That is, have the comment > explain the policy instead of simply stating what the code does (which > is always bad comment policy, you can read the code just fine). What is the objection for multi sockets? If it improves the behaviour then why would this be a bad thing for multi sockets? Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/9] Support IntelĀ® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 8/9] acpi: bus: Set _OSC for diverse core support Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 2/9] x86/topology: Provide topology_num_packages() Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 4/9] x86: Enable Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 3/9] x86/topology: Define x86's arch_update_cpu_topology Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-26 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 20:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 1/9] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-26 20:30 +0200
[PATCH v6 7/9] acpi: bus: Enable HWP CPPC objects Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 9/9] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use CPPC to get max performance Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 6/9] x86/sched: Add SD_ASYM_PACKING flags to x86 ITMT CPU Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 00:10 +0200
csiph-web