Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1508550

Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning

From Solomon Peachy <pizza@shaftnet.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning
Date 2016-10-25 20:40 +0200
Message-ID <sweNI-Sp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <svPFE-17R-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sw9XI-6bh-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:24:55PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > -	if (count > 1) {
> > -		/* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
> > -		ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
> > -		if (ret < 0)
> > -			return ret;
> > -		else if (ret > 0)
> > -			cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
> > -	}
> > +	/* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
> > +	ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (ret > 0)
> > +		cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
> 
> That doesn't look equivalent to me (when count == 1).

I concur, this patch should not be applied in its current form.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy        		       pizza at shaftnet dot org
Delray Beach, FL                          ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:50 +0200
  RE: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-10-25 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Solomon Peachy <pizza@shaftnet.org> - 2016-10-25 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-25 22:30 +0200

csiph-web