Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1507333

[PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning
Date 2016-10-24 17:50 +0200
Message-ID <svPFE-17R-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the
possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization
presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition
of WARN_ON:

drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

As the driver just checks the same variable twice here, we can simplify
it by removing the second condition, which makes it more readable and
avoids the warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
index 680d60eabc75..094e6637ade2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
@@ -385,14 +385,13 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv,
 	if (WARN_ON(count <= 0))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (count > 1) {
-		/* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
-		ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
-		else if (ret > 0)
-			cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
-	}
+	/* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
+	ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ret > 0)
+		cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
 
 	cw1200_debug_txed_multi(priv, count);
 	for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
-- 
2.9.0

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-24 17:50 +0200
  RE: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-10-25 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Solomon Peachy <pizza@shaftnet.org> - 2016-10-25 20:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-10-25 22:30 +0200

csiph-web