Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1507278
| From | "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check |
| Date | 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <svP2V-Pj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <suptT-2bV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <suptU-2bV-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <suGl4-4T9-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <suN3b-12J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <svOJz-qi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2016-10-24 16:42+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 21/10/2016 20:39, rkrcmar@redhat.com wrote:
>> 2016-10-21 11:27+0000, David Laight:
>>> From: Pan Xinhui
>>>> Sent: 20 October 2016 22:28
>>>> Commit ("x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check") add one field "__u8
>>>> preempted" into struct kvm_steal_time. This field tells if one vcpu is
>>>> running or not.
>>>>
>>>> It is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed. 2) the vcpu is
>>>> preempted. Other values means the vcpu has been preempted.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt | 8 +++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> index 2a71c8f..3376f13 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> @@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME: 0x4b564d03
>>>> __u64 steal;
>>>> __u32 version;
>>>> __u32 flags;
>>>> - __u32 pad[12];
>>>> + __u8 preempted;
>>>> + __u32 pad[11];
>>>> }
>>>
>>> I think I'd be explicit about the 3 pad bytes you've left.
>>
>> Seconded.
>>
>> With that change are all KVM bits
>>
>> Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>
> Saw this after replying to the previous message. If you need to post v6
> of the full series, it would be nice if you removed the
> kvm_read_guest_cached. But anyway it wasn't my intention to override Radim.
The patch was acceptable to me even now, so I definitely wouldn't mind
if it were even nicer. :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 2/9] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 8/9] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 3/9] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-10-21 07:10 +0200
[PATCH v5 5/9] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 03:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-10-21 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-10-21 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 10:20 +0200
[PATCH v5 4/9] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-21 07:50 +0200
csiph-web