Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1505126

[PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface

From Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
Date 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <suptT-2bV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <suptT-2bV-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


This patch support to fix lock holder preemption issue.

For kernel users, we could use bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) to detech if
one vcpu is preempted or not.

The default implementation is a macro defined by false. So compiler can
wrap it out if arch dose not support such vcpu pteempted check.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 348f51b..44c1ce7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3506,6 +3506,18 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+/*
+ * In order to deal with a various lock holder preemption issues provide an
+ * interface to see if a vCPU is currently running or not.
+ *
+ * This allows us to terminate optimistic spin loops and block, analogous to
+ * the native optimistic spin heuristic of testing if the lock owner task is
+ * running or not.
+ */
+#ifndef vcpu_is_preempted
+#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu)	false
+#endif
+
 extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
 extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
 
-- 
2.4.11

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 2/9] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 3/9] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 1/9] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] x86, xen: support vcpu preempted check Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-10-21 07:10 +0200
  [PATCH v5 5/9] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu  preempted check Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 03:30 +0200
    RE: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu  preempted check David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-10-21 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu  preempted check "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-10-21 20:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted  check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 04:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu  preempted check Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 16:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu  preempted check "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-10-24 17:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted  check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 04:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support vcpu preempted  check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 10:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 4/9] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-20 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-10-24 10:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] implement vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-21 07:50 +0200

csiph-web