Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1505174
| From | Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain |
| Date | 2016-10-20 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <suqgi-2Md-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <su1UC-3KZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <su1UD-3KZ-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <suoHv-1G4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <suoHw-1G4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sup0R-21Y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> OK, I am more confused now. Are you predicting some quantity related > to transactions? Why would you divide abort count by branch count? > Further, I just looked at patch 6/6. It has the following text: > > + Also show with some branch flags that can be: > + - Predicted: display the average percentage of predicated branches. > + (predicated number / total number) > + - Abort: display the average percentage of abort branches. > + (abort number /total number) > + - Cycles: cycles in basic block. > > > I think there is inconsistency between what you are suggesting and > what the patch has. An abort is an unique branch. But yes there is no total number, so the formula will always be 100%. So yes would probably be better to just display a count for abort. -Andi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-19 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-20 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-20 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-10-21 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf report: Caculate and return the branch counting in callchain Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-10-25 20:20 +0200
csiph-web