Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1499360

Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write for normal IO

From Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write for normal IO
Date 2016-10-12 08:10 +0200
Message-ID <srkTL-ql-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <so1aV-6zc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <so1kC-6Cz-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <sqn7j-5hX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sreEF-4Dp-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:22:35AM +0100, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 10:28:28PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> > > From: Bobi Jam <bobijam.xu@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > If normal IO got short read/write, we'd restart the IO from where
> > > we've accomplished until we meet EOF or error happens.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam.xu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
> > > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-6389
> > > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14123
> > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/fail.c          |    1 +
> > >  .../staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h    |    2 +
> > >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c         |   41 ++++++++++++--------
> > >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_io.c       |   19 ++++++++-
> > >  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Due to other changes in the filesystem tree, this patch no longer
> > applies :(
> > 
> > Can you rebase it and resend?
> 
> How long will you be accepting patches to merge for? If its going
> to be a few weeks like to just include the missing two patches with
> the next batch.

I don't understand the question.  I always accept patches, no need to
not send them, I'll queue them up to the proper branches as needed.  So
what do you mean here?

> Another issue I need to look at is the IB changes. That's going to
> require some heavy surgery to the ko2iblnd driver so its going to
> take time for me to port this to the new RDMA RW api. That will
> need to be push to linus so ko2iblnd can work with the 4.9 tree
> if that is okay with you.

Sure, send the patches, but maybe it is a 4.10 thing if it's too much
work?

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write for normal IO James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 04:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write  for normal IO Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-09 16:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write  for normal IO James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-10-12 01:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 32/41] staging: lustre: llite: restart short read/write  for normal IO Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-10-12 08:10 +0200

csiph-web