Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1500649

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: xgene: Remove bogus IS_ERR() check

From Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] perf: xgene: Remove bogus IS_ERR() check
Date 2016-10-14 02:50 +0200
Message-ID <srYRb-2nn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <srSLL-78p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <srSLL-78p-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Tai Nguyen wrote:
> > In acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf we pass the address of a local variable to IS_ERR(),
> > which doesn't make sense, as the pointer must be a real, valid pointer.
> > This doesn't cause a functional problem, as IS_ERR() will evaluate as
> > false, but the check is bogus and causes static checkers to complain.
> 
> ... unless the test is actually a misspelled IS_ERR(res) and the current
> code is broken by effectively skipping it.

Sure.

In this case, res is a struct resource, so IS_ERR(res) is also bogus.

None of the pointer fields in struct resource are ever set to an ERR_PTR value,
so nothing in res is worth checking. Nothing else in the function prior to this
would be an ERR_PTR value either.

I believe this case was copy-paste and a thinko. There's some other error
handling in the file that does validly have to handle an ERR_PTR value.

Thanks,
Mark.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] perf: xgene: Remove bogus IS_ERR() check Tai Nguyen <ttnguyen@apm.com> - 2016-10-13 20:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] perf: xgene: Remove bogus IS_ERR() check Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-10-13 20:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] perf: xgene: Remove bogus IS_ERR() check Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-10-14 02:50 +0200

csiph-web