Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1496579

Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI
Date 2016-10-06 12:30 +0200
Message-ID <spe66-7jB-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <so7Jo-32K-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <so7Jo-32K-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:12:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> There's a number of 'interesting' problems with FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI, all
> caused by holding hb->lock while doing the rt_mutex_unlock()
> equivalient.
> 
> This patch doesn't attempt to fix any of the actual problems, but
> instead reworks the code to not hold hb->lock across the unlock,
> paving the way to actually fix the problems later.
> 
> The current reason we hold hb->lock over unlock is that it serializes
> against FUTEX_LOCK_PI and avoids new waiters from coming in, this then
> ensures the rt_mutex_next_owner() value is stable and can be written
> into the user-space futex value before doing the unlock. Such that the
> unlock will indeed end up at new_owner.
> 
> This patch recognises that holding rt_mutex::wait_lock results in the
> very same guarantee, no new waiters can come in while we hold that
> lock -- after all, waiters would need this lock to queue themselves.
> 
> It therefore restructures the code to keep rt_mutex::wait_lock held.
> 
> This (of course) is not entirely straight forward either, see the
> comment in rt_mutex_slowunlock(), doing the unlock itself might drop
> wait_lock, letting new waiters in. To cure this
> rt_mutex_futex_unlock() becomes a variant of rt_mutex_slowunlock()
> that return -EAGAIN instead. This ensures the FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI code
> aborts and restarts the entire operation.

Urgh, I missed a bunch :/

So there's the !new_owner case in wake_futex_pi() which can happen if
futex_lock_pi()'s rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock() failed but we still see
that task on the futex_q list (it hasn't yet done unqueue_me).

I wondered if we could sort this case by making fixup_owner() more
interesting, which got me looking at that.

And it turns out fixup_owner() relies on futex_pi_unlock() holding
hb->lock as well.. It does rt_mutex_owner() while holding wait_lock, but
then drops wait_lock to call fixup_pi_state_owner(), assuming the owner
it read remains valid.

ARGGH, what a mess.

Lemme stare at this more..

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-10-03 17:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 17:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-10-03 18:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 17:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-05 09:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-05 10:10 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-05 10:30 +0200
          Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-05 10:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-07 13:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-08 18:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-08 19:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-08 19:10 +0200
          Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-10 12:30 +0200
            Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-10 13:50 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-08 20:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-10 16:10 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH 1/4] futex: Cleanup variable names for futex_top_waiter() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] futex: Cleanup variable names for  futex_top_waiter() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-10-03 16:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] futex: Cleanup variable names for  futex_top_waiter() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-10-05 06:00 +0200
  [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-03 11:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-10-03 16:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-10-05 03:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-05 09:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-10-05 03:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-10-05 08:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-10-05 09:30 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-10-05 18:10 +0200

csiph-web