Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1497151

Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"?

Show all headers | View raw

>>> Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it
>>> to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention.
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e
>>>
>>> Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck"
>>> because of such changes for the documentation format?
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4
>>
>> How about submitting a patch to fix the problem?
> 
> Is the published commit (from 2016-08-08 / 2016-08-18) generally questionable
> as I see it by the interface "cgit" at the moment?
> 
> * Does this one contain only the deletion of the file "Documentation/coccinelle.txt"?

It seems that I got an inappropriate impression from this kind of
data display alone.


The display for the changed file name contains only the desired addition.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e


> I find another data display also interesting and more promising.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9269973/
> 
> * Should this patch about the desired file format conversion become available
>   also by the other known interfaces?

The interface "cgit v0.12" does not indicate the involved "renaming" (similarity index 56%)
so far which can be better seen in the downloadable patch file.

Regards,
Markus

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 07:50 +0200
  Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:00 +0200
    Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:10 +0200
      Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:30 +0200
        Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 09:30 +0200
          Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 15:30 +0200
        [PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the corresponding  documentation SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 16:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the corresponding  documentation Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the  corresponding documentation Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-10-11 10:00 +0200
      Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 08:40 +0200
    Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 08:10 +0200
    Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 14:30 +0200
      Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 15:20 +0200

csiph-web