Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1497135
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"? |
| Date | 2016-10-07 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <spCrM-mK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <spwcG-3WG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <spwmm-416-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it >> to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention. >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e >> >> Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck" >> because of such changes for the documentation format? >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4 > > How about submitting a patch to fix the problem? Is the published commit (from 2016-08-08 / 2016-08-18) generally questionable as I see it by the interface "cgit" at the moment? * Does this one contain only the deletion of the file "Documentation/coccinelle.txt"? * How should the result from the mentioned action "add it to dev-tools" look like finally? * How could the acknowledgements happen for a software transformation which seems to be incomplete there? I find another data display also interesting and more promising. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9269973/ * Should this patch about the desired file format conversion become available also by the other known interfaces? * Would it have been nicer to include a corresponding update for the file "scripts/coccicheck" there, too? * Do we need to clarify the distribution of the correct version any further? Regards, Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 07:50 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:00 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:10 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 08:30 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 09:30 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 15:30 +0200
[PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the corresponding documentation SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the corresponding documentation Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] scripts/coccicheck: Update reference for the corresponding documentation Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-10-11 10:00 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 08:40 +0200
Re: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 08:10 +0200
Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 14:30 +0200
Re: docs: Fixing "sphinxify coccinelle.txt"? SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-10-07 15:20 +0200
csiph-web