Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1492254
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended lpss unnecessarily |
| Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2016 05:30:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <smdJf-1tk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <smdzA-1jx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | linux-pm@vger.kernel.org |
| X-Extloop1 | 1 |
| X-Ironport-Av | E=Sophos;i="5.30,408,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1046786822" |
| X-Mailer | git-send-email 2.7.4 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 49 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:28:39 +0800 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <6e14fa9659f23da041bc5e65edcd53c3e4845c74.1475032126.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
| X-Original-References | <cover.1475032126.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1492254 |
Show key headers only | View raw
We have report that the intel_lpss_prepare() takes too much time during
suspend, and this is because we first resume the devices from runtime
suspend by resume_lpss_device(), to make sure they are in proper state
before system suspend, which takes 100ms for each LPSS devices(PCI power
state from D3_cold to D0). And since resume_lpss_device() resumes the
devices synchronously, we might get huge latency if we have many
LPSS devices.
So first try is to use pm_request_resume() instead, to make the runtime
resume process asynchronously. Unfortunately the asynchronous runtime
resume relies on pm_wq, which is freezed at early stage. So we choose
another method, that is to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices,
if they are already runtime suspended. This is safe because for LPSS
driver, the runtime suspend and system suspend are of the same
hook - i.e., intel_lpss_suspend(). And moreover, this device is
neither runtime wakeup source nor system wakeup source.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
index 41b1138..2ba8d19 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
@@ -485,6 +485,15 @@ static int resume_lpss_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
int intel_lpss_prepare(struct device *dev)
{
/*
+ * This is safe because:
+ * 1. The runtime suspend and system suspend
+ * are of the same hook.
+ * 2. This device is neither runtime wakeup source
+ * nor system wakeup source.
+ */
+ if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
+ return RPM_SUSPENDED;
+ /*
* Resume both child devices before entering system sleep. This
* ensures that they are in proper state before they get suspended.
*/
--
2.7.4
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] Define positive return value to RPM_SUSPEND for runtime-suspended devices Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-28 05:20 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] PM / sleep: Return RPM_SUSPENDED to keep devices in runtime-suspended Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-28 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / sleep: Return RPM_SUSPENDED to keep devices in runtime-suspended "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-09-28 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / sleep: Return RPM_SUSPENDED to keep devices in runtime-suspended Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-28 17:00 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended lpss unnecessarily Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-28 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended lpss unnecessarily Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-09-28 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended lpss unnecessarily Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-09-28 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Avoid resuming runtime-suspended lpss unnecessarily Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> - 2016-09-28 10:20 +0200
csiph-web