Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)

From	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Date	2016-09-26 14:40 +0200
Message-ID	<slDmp-3Pp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <sji2J-4LH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <skjg6-2JH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <skkOR-3Qd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <skw3D-2sP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <skJDz-2QE-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Daniel,

On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip
> > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only
> > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the
> > > interim patch was not in my tree.
> > 
> > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build folder?
> > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y".
> 
> Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in
> the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target
> directory as you described.

So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like?

-Alexey

Thread

Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder  switch to .eh_frame) Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com> - 2016-09-24 03:10 +0200
  Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder  switch to .eh_frame) Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2016-09-26 14:40 +0200
    Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder  switch to .eh_frame) Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com> - 2016-09-26 21:00 +0200

csiph-web