Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1491271
| From | Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking |
| Date | 2016-09-26 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <slDmp-3Pp-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <slBkC-2G3-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <slCA2-3kx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <slD33-3J5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: > On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel > <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote: >> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> >>> >>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones >>> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the >>> firmware. >> >> The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one. The problem is >> that wpa_supplicant uses two separate code paths: EAPOL messaging >> through data path and key configuration though nl80211. > > Can I find it described/reported somewhere? > > >>> Unfortunately our old tracking code wasn't very accurate. It was >>> treating skb as pending as soon as it was passed by the netif. Actual >>> handling packet to the firmware was happening later as brcmfmac >>> internally queues them and uses its own worker(s). >> >> That does not seem right. As soon as we get a 1x packet we need to wait >> with key configuration regardless whether it is still in the driver or >> handed over to firmware already. > > OK, thanks. Actually, it's not OK. I was trying to report/describe/discuss this problem for over a week. I couldn't get much of answer from you. I had to come with a patch I worked on for quite some time. Only then you decided to react and reply with a reason for a nack. I see this patch may be wrong (but it's still hard to know what's going wrong without a proper hostapd bug report). I'd expect you to somehow work & communicate with open source community. -- Rafał
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-26 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-26 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-27 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-30 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> - 2016-09-26 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-27 11:10 +0200
csiph-web