Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1491271

Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking

From Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking
Date 2016-09-26 14:40 +0200
Message-ID <slDmp-3Pp-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <slBkC-2G3-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <slCA2-3kx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <slD33-3J5-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>>> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
>>> firmware.
>>
>> The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one. The problem is
>> that wpa_supplicant uses two separate code paths: EAPOL messaging
>> through data path and key configuration though nl80211.
>
> Can I find it described/reported somewhere?
>
>
>>> Unfortunately our old tracking code wasn't very accurate. It was
>>> treating skb as pending as soon as it was passed by the netif. Actual
>>> handling packet to the firmware was happening later as brcmfmac
>>> internally queues them and uses its own worker(s).
>>
>> That does not seem right. As soon as we get a 1x packet we need to wait
>> with key configuration regardless whether it is still in the driver or
>> handed over to firmware already.
>
> OK, thanks.

Actually, it's not OK. I was trying to report/describe/discuss this
problem for over a week. I couldn't get much of answer from you.

I had to come with a patch I worked on for quite some time. Only then
you decided to react and reply with a reason for a nack. I see this
patch may be wrong (but it's still hard to know what's going wrong
without a proper hostapd bug report). I'd expect you to somehow work &
communicate with open source community.

-- 
Rafał

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-26 13:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-26 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 14:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-27 11:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 00:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-30 10:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> - 2016-09-26 17:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: implement more accurate skb tracking Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> - 2016-09-27 11:10 +0200

csiph-web