Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1487768

Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Kees,

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 04:17:36PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc7 next-20160919]
>
>Hah, and here I thought if I didn't mark it with "[PATCH]" 0-day would
>skip it! ;)
>
>Is there a way to mark "just FYI" patches that go to the list to get
>skipped by 0-day?

The 0-day bot will auto skip emailed patches without "Signed-off-by: ". 
Will that be enough? I can also add the "[PATCH...]" detect.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-20 07:00 +0200
  Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-20 08:00 +0200
    Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 01:20 +0200
      Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-21 04:40 +0200
        Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 04:50 +0200
  Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-09-20 16:20 +0200
    Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 02:40 +0200
      Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-21 03:10 +0200
  Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-21 07:40 +0200

csiph-web