Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1487716
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy |
| Date | 2016-09-21 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sjCut-16r-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sjljX-6Og-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjmg2-7nQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Kees, > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc7 next-20160919] Hah, and here I thought if I didn't mark it with "[PATCH]" 0-day would skip it! ;) Is there a way to mark "just FYI" patches that go to the list to get skipped by 0-day? -Kees -- Kees Cook Nexus Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-20 07:00 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-20 08:00 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 01:20 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-21 04:40 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 04:50 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-09-20 16:20 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-09-21 02:40 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-09-21 03:10 +0200
Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-09-21 07:40 +0200
csiph-web